Everyone has their own workarounds: tab groups, different windows, bespoke file trees. But what if you could build a browser that does exactly what you want it to do, rather than trying to impose its own, one-size-fits-all structure onto you?
That was the founding mission of Shift: put power back into the people’s hands. It’s why we took a look at a landscape full of companies cramming nebulous AI “features” into every nook and cranny and asked, “Wait, do people actually want all of this?”
So Shift conducted a survey of nearly 1500 people to answer that question.
81% of respondents said they were willing to switch browsers for better personalization. This includes drag-and-drop building, customizable layouts, seamless app integration. They want to be able to handle Jira tickets, Asana, email, Slack, and all manner of work organizations in a specific space; and their personal projects separately.
They also want research assistance. The kind where you aren’t “searching,” you’re finding. This is where features like AI summarization (which 34% of respondents want) and task automation (32%) can actually help and for those who don’t want those features, a browser that doesn’t force them onto users will make the switch worthwhile.
About 32% of respondents are daily users of AI tools; much of this cohort works in tech. While they’re active AI users, they also very much want guardrails in place, including AI regulation (46%).
This is a crucial demographic, but it also indicates that there’s a huge percentage of people who want choice when it comes to AI features, and may be interested in a more gradual approach to integration, especially given issues with AI accuracy, a concern for 36% of respondents.
Then there’s privacy: 48% of respondents put privacy as a top concern in their browsing experience, and 81% of people are concerned about AI using their personal data. Another 43% have concerns about unauthorized actions AI tools may take. (Witness the Meta AI Safety Director who had OpenClaw delete her entire inbox.)
The word we kept coming back to in this research is intentional. People don’t want AI everywhere. They want it where it actually helps.
They want a browser that reduces noise, not adds to it. One that understands what they’re working on, helps them move faster, and then gets out of the way. They want control over when AI shows up, how it’s used, and what it has access to.
So that’s what we built.
With Shift AI, we didn’t set out to create an “AI browser.” We set out to fix the browser itself so it finally works the way people do.
That means: AI that understands context across your apps and workflows, research that feels like finding, not searching, automation that reduces the grind instead of adding more steps and privacy and control built in, not bolted on.
And most importantly, it means choice. Because the future of AI isn’t about replacing how we work. It’s about removing the friction that makes work harder than it needs to be.
The real problem was never AI.
It was the layer we built our digital lives on top of.
Now we finally have a chance to fix it.
The cyber insurance industry set out to manage financial risk. Along the way, it has…
On Tuesday, May 5, Boston Review convened a panel of three prominent writers—Kevin T. Baker,…
April 2026 Highlights 112 premium XYZ Registry domains were registered* Most popular TLDs in premium…
Star Wars: Fate of the Old Republic won't be another bloated single-player game that takes…
The stories in the Bible have been told in many ways, not least through film.…
Roxit.com sold for $58,000 to lead all domain sales at Sedo. XX.eu was second at…
This website uses cookies.