2025 Election results from Ohio
OHIO (WOWK) – It’s Election Day in Ohio, and the polls closed at 7:30 p.m.

As results come in Tuesday night, we’ll update you with the latest results from the Ohio counties in our region right here on wowktv.com.

Gallia County:

  • City of Gallipolis Council (Vote 3):
    • Michael Carter
    • R. William Jenkins
    • Dennis Kirby
    • William B Thomas
  • Village of Centerville Council (Vote 4):
    • Ann Daniels
    • Lorri J. Hively
  • Village of Cheshire Council (Vote 3):
    • Melissa R. Amos
    • Eric P. Jones
    • Connie S. Palmer
    • Danny R. Palmer
    • Charles L. Tabor
  • Village of Crown City Council (Vote 4):
    • Eric Burgess
    • Kellie M. Halley
    • Ronnie L. Mattox
    • John Theiss
  • Village of Rio Grande Council (Vote 4):
    • Jonathan M. Davis
    • Janette A. Elliott
    • Annette P. Ward
  • Village of Rio Grande Council (Vote 2):
    • Kaitlynn R. Halley
    • Shelbie L. Willis
  • Village of Vinton Council (Vote 4):
    • Chuck Easter
    • Michele L. George
    • Rebekah Greenlee
    • Vicki L. Moore
    • Ashley K. Walker
  • Ordinance providing for a .5% levy increase on income for the purpose of street paving, police and cemetery department for the City of Gallipolis.
    • For the income tax
    • Against the income tax
  • Renewal of Addison Township’s tax levy for providing and maintaining fire apparatus, fire equipment, appliances, etc.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Village of Vinton operating expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • An additional 1% tax levy for the Village of Rio Grande’s police, fire and street maintenance
    • For the income tax
    • Against the income tax.
  • Sale of beer, wine and liquor at Piggin’ Chix Steakhouse
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine, mixed beverages and liquor on Sundays by Piggin’ Chix Steakhouse
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages at American Legion Post 0027
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages on Sundays at American Legion Post 0027
    • Yes
    • No

Jackson County

  • City of Jackson Council Member at Large (Vote 3):
    • Marva Colby
    • Brett Foster
    • Brittony Hinsch
  • Village of Oak Hill Council (Vote 4):
    • Kay I. Cooper
    • Tara K. Cooper
    • Terry L. McCain
    • Brian T. Moore
    • Jeremy L. VanDine
  • City of Wellston Council Member at Large (Vote 3):
    • Roaby Danzell Browning
    • Tami Lynn Phillips
    • D. Keith Woolum
  • Resolution to reduce the number of members on the Coalton Village Council from six to five.
    • Yes
    • No
  • Renewal tax levy for Jackson County community programs and services authorized by county boards of developmental disabilities.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Jackson County ambulance services and emergency medical services:
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for the City of Wellston for construction, street and road work and bridge work
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy in the Village of Coalton for street lighting maintenance
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • A Renewal tax levy for the City of Jackson to maintain and operate Fairmont Cemetery
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • A replacement tax levy for Bloomfield Township fire protection and maintenance
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement levy for Hamilton Township fire protection and maintenance
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Milton Township to maintain and operate cemeteries.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for the Village of Oak Hill’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for the Village of Oak Hill to maintain and operate Village cemeteries
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Washington Township to maintain and operate cemeteries
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy

Lawrence County

  • Village of Athalia Council (Vote 4):
    • Deborah Ann Blevins
    • Hope Johnson
    • Andrea M. Shafer
  • Village of Chesapeake Town Council (Vote 4):
    • Lisa M. Blake
    • Christina N. Parsons
  • Village of Coal Grove Council (Vote 4):
    • Gregory Massie
    • Michael E. McKenzie
    • Nick McKnight
    • Diana Wise
  • Village of Hanging Rock Council (Vote 4):
    • Timothy M. Dickens
    • David Hopper
    • John K. Waginger
  • Ironton City Council (Vote 4):
    • Bob Cleary
    • Craig Harvey
    • Nate Kline
    • George D. McCalvin
    • Troy Scott
    • Sarah Simmons
  • Village of Proctorville Council (Vote 4):
    • Courtey Chapman
    • John Mayes
    • Daniel Swann
  • Village of South Point Council (Vote 4):
    • Sandra Daniel
    • Robert G. Payne
    • Charles A. Withrow
    • Brad Adkins
    • Maria chapman
    • David Classing
  • An additional tax levy for the benefit of Lawrence County for developmental disabilities programs
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for fire protection in Perry Township (excluding South Point and Coal Grove)
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for the Village of Athalia’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax for the Village of Athalia’s fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Upper Township’s fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Shall the Board of Commissioners of Lawrence County have the authority to aggregate the retail electric customers located in the unincorporated areas of Elizabeth, Hamilton, Perry, Rome, Union, Upper and Washington townships, and for that purpose, enter into services agreements to facilitate for those loads the sale and ourchase of electricity, such aggregation to occur autmatically except where any person elects to opt out?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the Board of Commissioners of Lawrence County have the authority to aggregate the retail natural gas customers located in the unincorporated areas of Elizabeth, Hamilton, Perry, Rome, Union, Upper and Washington townships, and for that purpose, enter into services agreements to facilitate for those loads the sale and ourchase of natural gas, such aggregation to occur autmatically except where any person elects to opt out?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages at Walmart Supercenter 1478 at 354 Private Drive 288, South Point, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at Walmart Supercenter 1478 at 354 Private Drive 288, South Point, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages at Sam’s Club 8152 at 432 Private Drive 288, South Point, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at Sam’s Club 8152 at 432 Private Drive 288, South Point, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages at Speedway at 296 County Rd 410, South Point, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at Speedway at 296 County Rd 410, South Point, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages at Kash Stop at 3302 State Route 243, Ironton, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at Kash Stop at 3302 State Route 243, Ironton, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of beer, wine and mixed beverages at Kash Stop at 3667 State Route 7 in Chesapeake, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at Kash Stop at 3667 State Route 7 in Chesapeake, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the sale of beer, as defined in section 4305.8 of the revised code under permits which authorize sale for on-premises consumption only and under permits which authorize sale for both on-premises and off-premises consumption, be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the sale of beer, as defined in section 4305.8 of the revised code under permits which authorize sale for off-premises consumption only, be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the sale of spirituous liquor by the glass, as defined in section 4301.1 of the revised code, be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the sale of wine and mixed beverages by the package, under permits which authorize sale for off-premise consumption only, be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the sale of wine and mixed beverages, under permits which authorize sale for on-premise consumption only and under permits which authorize sale for both on-premise and off-premise consumption, be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall the sale of spirituous liquor by the glass be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Shall state liquor stores or liquor agency stores for the sale of spirituous liquor by the package for the consumption of the premises where sold be permitted in Chesapeake A?
    • Yes
    • No

Meigs County

  • Village of Middleport Council (Vote 4):
    • Elyse Blackston
    • Katie Perry
  • Village of Racine Council (Vote 4):
    • Robert E. Beegle
    • Kevin Dugan
    • Fred Nero
    • Ian Wise
  • Village of Syracuse Council (Vote 4)
    • Jane Ann Hupp
    • Bradley Wayne Mccoy
    • Jordan Lee Snoke
  • A renewal tax levy for the Meigs County Health Department’s operating expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • An additional tax levy for Meigs County 911 services
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • An additional tax levy for Meigs Local School District’s general permanent improvements
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Eastern Local School District bond issuance for constructing, renovating and improving school facilities AND an additional tax levy for funding
    • For the bond issue and levy
    • Against the bond issue and levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Lebanon Township to maintain and operate cemeteries
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Orange Township’s fire protection and prevention
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for Rutland Village police protection that the county auditor estimates will collect $25,394 annually at a rate not exceeding 5 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $175 for each $100,000 of the county auditor’s appraised value for 5 years.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for Rutland Village police protection that the county auditor estimates will collect $7,404 annually at a rate not exceeding 2 mills for each $1 of taxable value, which amounts to $70 for each $100,000 of the county auditor’s appraised value for 5 years.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Rutland’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Rutland Township’s fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Shall the Village of Rutland have the authority to aggregate the retail electricity loads located in the Village of Rutland, and for that purpose, enter into service agreements to facilitate for those loads the sale and purchase of electricity, such aggregation to occur automatically except where any person elects to opt out?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Renewal tax levy for Salem Township for cemetery maintenance
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for Middleport Village’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Salisbury Township, excluding Middleport and Pomeroy, for fire protection.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Racine Village’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for Syracuse Village’s fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for Syracuse Village’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages at Taz’s Marathon at 34110 State Route 7, Chester Township, Pomeroy, Ohio.
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at Taz’s Marathon at 34110 State Route 7, Chester Township, Pomeroy, Ohio.
    • Yes
    • No
  • Sale of wine and mixed beverages on Sunday at One Twenty-Four Mart AT 31637 Dead Mans Curve Road, Salisbury Township, Pomeroy, Ohio
    • Yes
    • No

Scioto County

  • Portsmouth Council Ward 1:
    • Sean Dunne
    • David Malone
  • Portsmouth Council Ward 5
    • Edwin Martell
    • Chris Neff
  • Village of New Boston Council (Vote 2):
    • Mike Meehan
    • Jon Mills
    • Ryan Ottney
  • Renewal tax levy for funding for operations, maintenance and equipment and capital improvements for Portsmouth’s flood defense system
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for the Village of New Boston’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for the Village of New Boston’s fire defense
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Brush Creek Township to maintain cemeteries
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Brush Creek Township to maintain the township park.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for South Webster’s current expenses
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for two existing levies for Bloom Township fire protection and EMS services
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Clay Township fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Clay Township for general construction, resurfacing, repair, etc. of roads and bridges.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for emergency ambulance services in Jefferson Township
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Jefferson Township for general construction, resurfacing, repair, etc. of roads and bridges.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for emergency ambulance services in Nile Township
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Nile Township’s police protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Rush Township for general construction, resurfacing, repair, etc. of roads and bridges.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Rush Township’s police vehicles, communications, equipment and salaries.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Valley Township’s fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Vernon Township’s fire protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Vernon Township for general construction, resurfacing, repair, etc. of roads and bridges.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Washington Township’s police protection
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Shall the zoning plan submitted by the Washington Township Zoning Commission and adopted by the Washington Township Trustees on July 10, 2025, be put into effect?
    • Yes
    • No

Vinton County

  • Village of Hamden Council (Vote 4):
    • Michael Claar
    • Lynley Suzanne Holzapfel
  • Village of Wilkesville Council (Vote 4):
    • Wilburn Ranny Gunnoe
    • Theresa R. Phillips
    • Eddie L. Shepherd
  • Village of Zaleski Council (Vote 4):
    • Nora B. Brooks
    • Nathan Christopher Broome
    • Bryan J. McCollum
    • Carrie Arlene McCollum
  • Renewal tax levy for Clinton Township, including the Village of Hamden, for cemetery maintenance and operation.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Clinton Township, excluding the Village of Hamden, for maintaining fire apparatus, mechanical resuscitators, underwater rescue and recovery equipment, etc.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Replacement tax levy for Eagle Township for fire and EMS purposes
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for the Village of McAurthur for construction, resurfacing, and repairs of streets, roads and bridges in municipal corporations, counties or townships.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Elk Township, including McArthur Village, for maintaining and operating cemeteries.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for the Village of Zaleski, excluding Madison Township, for construction, resurfacing, and repairs of streets, roads and bridges in municipal corporations, counties or townships.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for the Village of Zaleski, excluding Madison Township, for maintaining fire apparatus, mechanical resuscitators, underwater rescue and recovery equipment, etc.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for the Village of Zaleski, excluding Madison Township, for parks and recreational purposes.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Renewal tax levy for Madsion Township, excluding Zaleski Corporation, for maintaining fire apparatus, mechanical resuscitators, underwater rescue and recovery equipment, etc.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy
  • Additional tax levy for the Village of Wilkesville for maintaining and operating cemeteries.
    • For the tax levy
    • Against the tax levy

Discover more from RSS Feeds Cloud

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from RSS Feeds Cloud

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading