This agreement became a requirement in August of last year.
It wasn’t until just this month that the city turned the cameras off.
When Murrill learned of the city’s violation, she sent a notice stating that she would initiate a formal investigation and pursue malfeasance in office charges against all responsible officials if the city continued to violate the law.
“It is a requirement that is in the statute. It was in the statute before the current law was created to add malfeasance as an enforcement mechanism and penalty,” Murrill said.
Murrill says the city plans to keep the cameras off until a CEA is in place.
“That’s good that they were responsive to the concern that people could be charged with malfeasance if they were violating the law, so I think that was the right response,” Murrill said.
According to Murrill, the city collected about $2 million when the cameras were operating.
She is demanding that all of those funds be returned to the drivers.
While the cameras will be off for some time, the law will remain the same when it comes to school zone speeds.
“It’s still against the law to speed in a school zone and you could be ticketed by an actual police officer,” Murrill said.
50 Years Ago The Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group (Mass-PIRG) has criticized the Northampton Small…
WESTHAMPTON — Voters shot down a request for a $500,000 Proposition 2½ override by 59 votes…
NORTHAMPTON — After setting 27 fires between 2007 and 2009 that terrorized Ward 3 neighborhoods…
SUNDERLAND — Investigators have determined that the fire at the Sugarloaf Estates apartment complex on…
Repeating the mantra that “food is medicine,” U.S. Rep. Jim McGovern is leading a bipartisan…
LEVERETT — A two-story home just east of North Leverett center was destroyed in a…
This website uses cookies.