
On Sept. 28, 2023, several Salt Lake City residents filed a complaint against Salt Lake City alleging they were “prisoners in their own homes,” due to the city allowing them to engage in public camping.
The complaint also cited behaviors of unsheltered populations such as public urination and use of illegal drugs as evidence of the city’s failure.
On April 4, 2024, the district court ruled in favor of the city arguing that city, “owed no duty to the [residents] individually, apart from its general duty to enforce laws and to protect the public.”
The original lawsuit named nine plaintiffs, who appealed the district court decision all the way up to the supreme court who affirmed the lower district court’s dismissal.
“We acknowledge the difficult realities that residents are experiencing due to the actions unsheltered people are taking on and near their properties. But our sincere sympathy to those difficulties cannot dictate how we apply the law,” the court decision reads.
Complainants cited what’s known as the “public duty doctrine,” a legal principle that allows governments to perform duties without fear of civil liability. However, the court found the argument insufficient.
“The public duty doctrine exists to preclude claims against government actors for any alleged failure to adequately perform their public duties,” the court said. “Residents have not shown that the city owed them any unique duty beyond what it owes to all people within city limits.”
Latest headlines:
- Judges overseeing Trump cases speak out against threats
- Monroe Canyon Fire burns 12 power lines, power out since Wednesday for over 3000 customers
- Karoline Leavitt details $200M ballroom plans at White House
- Woman charged with embezzling from elementary school PTA fund
- Man accused of killing Sgt Hooser faces new charges after allegedly attacking deputies
Discover more from RSS Feeds Cloud
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
