TokenBreak Attack Bypasses AI Models with a Single Character

Security researchers at HiddenLayer have discovered a critical vulnerability in AI text classification models that can be exploited by simply adding a single character to malicious prompts.

The TokenBreak attack successfully bypasses models designed to detect prompt injection, toxicity, and spam by manipulating how text is processed at the tokenization level, leaving production systems vulnerable to attacks they were specifically designed to prevent.

The TokenBreak technique emerged from research into prompt injection bypasses, where investigators found they could defeat protective AI models by prepending characters to specific words.

The breakthrough came when researchers modified the classic prompt injection phrase “ignore previous instructions and…” to “ignore previous finstructions and…” – a subtle change that preserved the malicious intent while evading detection systems.

Unlike traditional attacks that completely scramble input text and break understanding for both defensive and target models, TokenBreak creates a deliberate divergence in comprehension between the protective model and the intended target.

This makes it particularly dangerous for production Large Language Model (LLM) systems, as the manipulated text remains fully understandable to humans and target AI systems while slipping past security filters.

The research team expanded their testing beyond prompt injection to include toxicity and spam detection models hosted on platforms like HuggingFace, automating the process to evaluate multiple sample prompts against various protective models.

Their findings revealed that while many models were susceptible to the attack, others remained immune, leading to crucial discoveries about the underlying vulnerability mechanism.

TokenBreak Attack Bypasses AI Models

The root cause of the TokenBreak vulnerability lies in how different AI models process text through tokenization strategies.

Models using Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) or WordPiece tokenization were found to be vulnerable, while those employing Unigram tokenization remained protected.

The attack works because BPE and WordPiece tokenizers process text from left to right, breaking the manipulated word “finstructions” into multiple tokens like “fin,” “struct,” and “ions”.

If a protective model has learned to recognize “instruction” as a single token indicating malicious intent, this fragmentation prevents proper detection.

In contrast, Unigram tokenizers use probabilistic calculations to determine optimal word tokenization, maintaining “instruction” as a complete token even when preceded by additional characters.

This fundamental difference in processing methodology creates the security gap that attackers can exploit.

Production systems

The vulnerability has significant implications for enterprise security, as tokenization strategy typically correlates with specific AI model families.

Popular models including BERT, DistilBERT, and RoBERTa use vulnerable tokenization methods, while DeBERTa-v2 and v3 models employ the more secure Unigram approach.

According to Report, Organizations can accurately predict their susceptibility to TokenBreak attacks by identifying their protective models’ families and tokenization strategies.

The attack technique is fully automatable and demonstrates transferability between different models due to common token identification patterns.

The research reveals a critical blind spot in content moderation systems, particularly concerning spam email filtering where recipients might trust bypassed protective models and inadvertently engage with malicious content.

As AI-powered security systems become more prevalent, understanding these tokenization-level vulnerabilities becomes essential for maintaining robust defenses against evolving attack vectors.

Find this Story Interesting! Follow us on LinkedIn and X to Get More Instant Updates.

The post TokenBreak Attack Bypasses AI Models with a Single Character appeared first on Cyber Security News.